Home
Subscription
Submit
Current Issue
About
Masthead

Being and Time

By Frederick Pollack

1 This gadget is supposed to measure the density of being. It doesn’t work. There may be interference. When I factor in History, the way the instructions say, I get readings near zero; when I turn the knob for Outcomes, the pointer runs off the dial. Which means what? That everything depends on me, on how I position the monitor, tickle the little toggle switch? A bit to the right and helicopters descend, disgorging troops so laden with armor, night-vision goggles (it’s noon, guys) and nerve-gas detectors they’re impressive. They’re making that “GO GO GO” noise and spraying me on full automatic. Turn the switch a full notch and the place stinks – bathing has gone; we’re drinking piss out of skulls amid rubble. A dude in rags is giving a sermon I could find interesting: Creation is entirely in the hands of a lower god; but then he points a claw at me, and I log off. “That’s a hell of a laptop,” says a yuppie at a nearby table, who had thought that only software was evolving; his envy fades as I explain. My colleagues all buy this machine, but seldom explore its functions. They play the video-game of feeling, simulate how naughty they could be, type with two fingers, and work at home, not pretending to be in the world. 2 The days have turned warm enough – at least on the small and shifting prayer-rugs the sun spreads – to let me hold conferences on a bench in the quad. Awaiting a student, I wonder how long before this avuncular, low-mimetic style dissolves my reputation (with myself at least) for visionary edginess, and brands me minor. The girl supposedly coming seldom talks in class, but her hard dark eyes and small pouting mouth think. She is as frightened of her twenties as any of her classmates (I know from their short stories); but not, like them, paralyzed by nostalgia for the cartoons and video-games of childhood. The “next stage of her life” seems, rather, something to be despised and mythicized, as oblivion is to me. In her last story, a girl, on the eve of her wedding to a dull, solid cipher, sleeps with a former, bad-boy lover; and, alone in the morning, admires the bruises, purple against her pale white skin. I gave it an A. Now she’s frightened (she said) of poetry, our next unit. She’s also late. Other students are hurrying to class. They broadcast no sense of open horizons, immanent power or love, or joy without drinking, but remind me of the painting of a girl and a shadow Munch called “Adolescence.” I’ve often thought it could have other titles. It doesn’t matter if she doesn’t come. I compose a tutorial: There is a shaft those few who can see dig in darkness their whole lives long, and forget if it’s ore they seek, or an exit; we meet, my dear, in this tunnel. 3 A higher being has materialized in the house of an aspiring suicide bomber. The bomber’s adoring sisters sit on the couch, hugging each other, each breath a gasp. The mother hovers painfully, as always. The father has stopped prostrating himself; now stands by a wall, reminding his features to look fierce, not to go slack. For none of the verses, prayers, spells for such an occasion have worked; the Being is not what one expects. No wings, no smell of myrrh (whatever that smells like); faint tang of ozone; a featureless, sexless, big, golden man like an Oscar. And what it says is totally, horribly wrong. Now it’s lecturing about water, desertification, Israeli technology that could benefit the whole region if some accommodations were made. The boy sits upright on the good chair beneath a photo of his brother who killed himself and eight Marines, and posters of other martyrs and leaders; their beards and eyes strangely feminized, white stallions, lightning bolts all very Hollywood-retro – that was the Being’s first comment. Its voice is inappropriate, not an unctuous thunder but grating, tentative, pensive. It describes the logistics of the boy blowing himself up, details of brains, balls, eyeballs along with parts of other people spattered around some Shi’a market. The sisters become more hysterical. The mother flees the room. The boy ponders a run for the father’s pistol. “You’re a Jew!” he screams. “You work for the CIA!” “Of course I work for the CIA,” says the thing. “And the FBI, NSA, NATO, WTO“ – an endless, disdainful string. Then it returns to its favorite theme since it appeared: the attempt of the inadequate, whatever their potential cultural resources, to escape history, contradiction, time in some delusional certainty. The boy begins to sing a song about martyrs, death, God and vengeance his brother loved. The father joins in, coughing; then (is it allowed?) the sisters, and even the mother in the next room. They’re all very moved. The higher being, sighing inaudibly, seems to swell, the light it generates to grow until – like the golden glow the boy had imagined when his bomb went off – it absorbs and transforms them all. For reason can only triumph by a miracle. 4 As early as his first lectures and throughout his career, Heidegger, closely following Rilke, invokes worn objects, soaked in sweat and fate. Peasant boots, wooden bowls and ladles as opposed to impersonal, lifeless, mass-produced, American things. I wonder what he would have made of my great-aunt Sophie’s dresser. Already old in the Teens when she probably inherited it, older when, with a kind of prickly horror, I saw it in the Fifties. Smelling of powder and sachets, perfumes and toilet water, warm dust, but not of sun in that room with drapes always closed. On its top, yellowed costume jewelry, curlers and pins, and a brush that went many times each night through the hair of that woman I didn’t love. 5 In Jack Levine’s “Under the El,” 1952, the paint flickers over the stocky bodies of, let’s call them Morrie and Gritch (hats, jackets; a tuba in the pawnshop window), and is those bodies and the light filtering through the struts of the El to the pawnshop world around them, and is also a sign of Levine’s contempt for the Abstract Expressionists. They have been up all night (i.e., Morrie and Gritch, not Pollock and Kline, though probably they too), playing cards and drinking, moving stolen goods, or working, and now look, Morrie guarded, Gritch belligerent, at you. “I’m for Ike. He’ll work with Joe, sort out those commie bastards. Then we’ll be safe, and can annex the planets.” “You know, heavy industry is leaving this town. It’s an unintended consequence of Roosevelt. Now that the South has electricity, it’s moving there among the servile crackers.” “I’m in tight with the Union. They’ll protect me. And my son, if I had a son, would be rich. With a television.” “Oh there’s lots of money around. Those glass-walled towers going up on Park and Madison. Capital seeking the sun, building roads for itself. The El will go, that tuba, pawnshops, delis with commies jabbering in Yiddish.” “I remember a horse, youth and a gun, the stars, but not the details of that job.” “You can’t regret. I learned that Inside. Regret is another prison.” – But that’s all crap. The point of a painting is not knowing what they were saying before they saw you, and the point of time is not knowing. Postmodernist “intervention” is too small an insight to base a culture on: everyone feels at times he’s in a painting, film, or novel; then time moves on and you’re not. It’s strange that no one thinks he’s part of a poem. 6 Ultimately the arrow of time slows and drops on an infinite plain. If the beings who are there to pick it up are merely organized quantum impulses, I’m not interested. Let’s say they’re gods, as human as gods, as troubled, with a quirky sense of humor. They have with them the jar that was originally associated with the Great Goddess, and when she was reduced by patriarchy to a silly girl, became the box that Epimetheus, the Backward-seer, gave her. But they have that box. It’s empty, finally, definitively, of everything that was in it, except that famous thing she shut the lid on, whatever the gesture implied. Now they take the arrow, dip it in that poison, shoot it back.